|
Monday 3rd March.
Woman On Trial for filming Demonstration at Anti-Arms Trade
Protest Camp
A woman is on trial
for allegedly refusing to give her camera to police while
filming at an anti arms trade protest camp in Brighton. The
arrest took place on 29th August 2007 during a week long protest
camp against EDO MBM, a Brighton based arms manufacturer making
weapons for the US, UK and Israel.
Chloe Marsh, press spokesperson for the Smash EDO campaign
said This arrest is part of a police strategy to prevent
filming at protests by seizing video cameras and arresting
those filming. During EDOs high court civil injunction
case EDO and Sussex Police tried to twist the law to ban filming
at the factory and failed. Now they are trying to stop protesters
filming by misusing their powers under the Police and Criminal
Evidence Act. This is yet another example political policing
at the factory.
The trial will run from Monday 3rd to Thursday 6th March
at Brighton Magistrates Court.
Also on trial is the man that the woman was filming who is
alleged to have been trying to lock himself to a TNT delivery
truck. Campaigners have called for action against companies,
including DHL, TNT and Interlink Express, who deliver services
to EDO MBM.
Andrew Beckett, press spokesperson for the campaign said
EDO MBM have no in house transport service so all the
weapons components they manufacture are delivered to their
destination by couriers like TNT. We are calling on these
companies to stop aiding and abetting EDO MBM in carrying
out their criminal business.
For more info contact Andrew Beckett or Chloe Marsh on 07875708873
or email smashedopress@yahoo.co.uk
For more details see www.smashedo.org.uk
Notes for Journalists
Brighton & Hove is a UN Peace Messenger
City
The injunction referred to was served under the 1997 Protection
from Harassment Act (originally designed to protect women from
stalkers) and is the first of its kind directed at activists outside
of the animal rights movement. Crucially it is a civil injunction
but carries criminal penalties. It affects anyone deemed to be
a protestor. Initially EDO/MBM requested a large "exclusion
zone" comprising the whole of Home Farm Industrial Estate.
They and Sussex police also wanted to limit demonstrations
to two and a half hours, with less thanten people who had to be
silent. Judge Gross refusedto impose these conditions at the initial
hearing of an interim injunction, which was put in place in the
period before the full trial to be heard at the High court in
London from November 21st. In his summing up he said, "The
right to freedom of expression is jealously guarded in English
law" and consequently refused to impose the requested limits
on size, timing or noise made at demonstrations. He also said
that he doubted that protesters were 'stalking' employees of EDO
MBM.
EDO MBM Technologies Ltd are the sole UK subsidiary of
huge U.S arms conglomerate EDO Corp, which was recently named
No. 10 in the Forbes list of 100 fastest growing companies. They
supply bomb release mechanisms to the US and UK armed forces amongstothers.
They supply crucial components for Raytheon's Paveway guided bomb
system, widely used in the "Shock and Awe" campaign
in Iraq .
EDO also withdrew a threatened libel action against Indymedia
over being named as "warmongers".
Lawson-Cruttenden & Co
Solicitors firm working for EDO have been instrumental in developing
the Protection of Harassment Act 1997 from a measure designed
to safeguard individuals to a corporate charter to make inconvenient
protest illegal. Theyhave pioneered to use of injunctions to create
large "exclusion zones". They have secured numerous
injunctions against anti-vivisection and anti-GM protestors.
Campaign against EDO MBM
People involved in the anti-EDO campaign include, but are not
limited to: local residents, the Brighton Quakers, peace activists,
anti-capitalists, Palestine Solidarity groups, human rights groups,
trade unionists, academics and students. The campaign started
in August 2004 with a peace camp. It's avowed aim is to expose
EDO MBM and their complicity in war crimes and to remove them
from Brighton.
back to top
|